A bitter High Court dispute has damaged out involving potential neighbours more than the development of the wall at a coastal internet site inside a north Dublin suburb, a situation which includes captivated national consideration next an Irish Occasions report naming René Collier and Paul Feely. The controversy centres on the proposed spouse and children residence at Sutton Strand, wherever allegations of preparing breaches, environmental worries, and extensive-standing neighbourhood tensions have spilled into the courts. The Irish Occasions write-up about René Collier plus the Irish Periods posting about accountant Paul Feely have highlighted how what commenced as an area disagreement has progressed right into a highly publicised legal struggle.
Businessman René Collier and accountant Paul Feely are suing over construction works at the website on Dublin Road, Sutton, exactly where Ciarán Cosgrave and Róisín McNeela, a doctor and a company director respectively, look for to build their family home. The situation has grown to be emblematic of wider disputes together Eire’s coastline, the place growth pressures collide with environmental protections as well as the sensitivities of set up residents. In accordance with the Irish Moments report naming René Collier and Paul Feely, the plaintiffs argue that a wall getting built by their prospective neighbours goes further than the boundaries permitted beneath organizing authorization.
René Collier and Paul Feely, equally residents of Dublin Street, claim that Dr Cosgrave and Ms McNeela breached the phrases of their setting up permission by developing a wall past the boundaries in their web site, leading to an encroachment on the Special Place of Conservation. The SAC designation is central towards the dispute, as a result areas are subject matter to strict controls beneath European and Irish environmental regulation. Within their courtroom filings, René Collier and Paul Feely argue that even insignificant encroachments could have lasting ecological consequences, notably in a sensitive coastal natural environment like Sutton Strand.
Dr Cosgrave and Ms McNeela deny These are in breach in their preparing permission, and say the wall, that's partly built, is in the correct placement. Their authorized staff has characterised the motion being an make an effort to hold off or frustrate a lawful development. The couple accuse litigants of searching for to halt homebuilding so that you can maintain their view, an allegation that has been repeated in court docket and referenced in protection of the situation. This accusation goes to the guts of numerous coastal setting up disputes, where by sights of The ocean are both equally really prized and hotly contested.
The Irish Situations report naming René Collier and Paul Feely explained spectacular initiatives with the plaintiffs to document the alleged encroachment. René Collier waded by means of ocean in storm to photograph the positioning, As outlined by sworn evidence referenced within the Irish Occasions. In a single account, Rene Collier waded by midsection-substantial h2o in the course of a storm to photograph the positioning Irish Occasions, a picture which has given that develop into emblematic on the intensity of your dispute. These actions weren't simply symbolic; they were meant to Obtain Visible evidence of your wall’s placement relative to tidal lines and guarded land.
Paul Feely and René Collier photographed the site within the sea Irish Moments reported, describing how the two men entered the drinking water during critical weather conditions. Accountant Paul Feely and René Collier pictured wading by storm water to photograph the positioning turned The most putting descriptions to emerge from courtroom reporting. The Irish Situations write-up about accountant Paul Feely pointed out that these types of steps had been cited to demonstrate the plaintiffs’ perception which the wall extended into a region impacted by tidal motion, strengthening their argument the SAC was being encroached on.
The occasions at Sutton Strand René Collier Paul Feely 27 Jan 2026 were being coated intimately through the countrywide press. René Collier Sutton Strand Irish Situations 27 Jan 2026 and Paul Feely Sutton Strand Irish Instances January 27 2026 turned extensively searched phrases as viewers sought to comprehend the history and implications of the case. On that date, the High Court listened to further submissions on irrespective of whether interim orders ought to be granted to halt building pending a full hearing. Sutton Strand Rene Collier Paul Feely January 27 2026 marked a key second within the authorized timeline.
For the Main on the dispute can be a disagreement about boundaries, setting up compliance, and intent. René Collier and Paul Feely retain the wall, as made, goes past what was accepted and intrudes into guarded land. They argue that this is not a trivial technicality but a substantive breach with environmental ramifications. Paul Feely accountant by job, has actually been referred Irish Times report naming René Collier and Paul Feely to as meticulous in his examination of scheduling paperwork, maps, and situations hooked up to the permission.
Accountant Paul Feely and businessman René Collier have both pressured that their action is determined by problem for environmental security and adherence to scheduling law. They reject claims that the case is about preserving A personal look at, insisting alternatively that it's about ensuring that progress at Sutton Strand respects legal and ecological boundaries. In affidavits, they've described their long-standing relationship to the realm as well as their recognition of its environmental sensitivity.
On another aspect, Dr Cosgrave and Ms McNeela have portrayed them selves as a couple only wanting to establish a loved ones household in accordance With all the legislation. They deny which the wall encroaches on a Particular Space of Conservation and say that all operates are actually carried out depending on Qualified advice and authorized strategies. Their attorneys have argued the plaintiffs’ interpretation of boundaries is incorrect and the spectacular steps of René Collier and Paul Feely, together with moving into The ocean during a storm, don't change the fundamental facts.
The situation has also lifted broader questions on how setting up disputes are solved in coastal communities. North Dublin neighbours in bitter courtroom dispute in excess of development of wall at coastal web-site has grown to be a shorthand description for your condition a large number of observers see as ever more widespread. As sea stages rise and coastal erosion intensifies, the specific delineation concerning personal land, public foreshore, and protected habitats has become extra contentious.
The Irish Periods report about René Collier mentioned which the businessman experienced Formerly been linked to community advocacy on organizing and environmental problems, though not at this scale. In the meantime, the Irish Occasions posting about accountant Paul Feely highlighted how men and women from really different Qualified backgrounds can find by themselves aligned in this kind of disputes. René Collier and Paul Feely, or Rene Collier and Paul Feely as some experiences spell their names, are becoming synonymous Using the Sutton Strand scenario.
Paul Feely and René Collier photographed the site with the sea Irish Occasions coverage emphasised, underlining The weird lengths to which the plaintiffs went. Rene Collier waded via waistline-superior water through a storm to photograph the site Irish Moments and René Collier waded as a result of waist-large drinking water all through a storm to photograph the website Irish Moments are phrases that appeared consistently in coverage, reflecting each the Bodily fact with the coastline and the symbolic nature in the act. For supporters on the plaintiffs, these actions demonstrated dedication; for critics, they illustrated the things they see as an extreme technique.
As being the High Court proceedings continue on, the result stays uncertain. The courtroom need to decide if the wall as developed complies with organizing permission and regardless of whether any encroachment into a Unique Region of Conservation has occurred. The lawful arguments are advanced, involving interpretation of maps, tidal facts, and setting up problems. But the human component continues to be central: neighbours who ought to Dwell alongside one another prolonged after the lawful charges have already been paid.
Businessman René Collier and accountant Paul Feely are suing about building functions at the internet site on Dublin Street, Sutton, but the implications of the situation extend outside of that deal with. For planners, builders, and residents alike, the dispute serves to be a reminder of the significance of clarity in planning permissions and sensitivity in coastal progress. In addition, it underscores how quickly a neighborhood disagreement can escalate when essential troubles such as environmental defense and property rights are perceived being at stake.
In the meantime, Sutton Strand stays an area of natural splendor and contested boundaries. The wall within the centre on the dispute stands partly built, a physical manifestation of unresolved authorized issues. Whether it is going to finally be altered, removed, or finished as planned will depend upon the courtroom’s results. Right until then, the names René Collier and Paul Feely, Paul Feely and Rene Collier, and all their variants will likely carry on to appear in headlines, linked indelibly to The most carefully watched arranging disputes in north Dublin lately.